Skip Nav

University of Wisconsin Stout | Wisconsin's Polytechnic University

preview rubric

❶Cohesiveness Ties together information from all sources. Writing , Writing-Essays , Informational Text.

School of Education

Online Professional Development

Poor MLA format not followed; multiple errors. Good Less than 3 formatting errors: Excellent Required number of resources; Required types of resources; Alphabetical order; works cited page titled; 1 inch margins; double spaced; second line of citation indented 5 spaces; Citations end with period.

Unacceptable Excessive errors 10 or more ; paper does not cover topic. Poor Contains no quotes, paraphrasing and summarizing; large number of grammatical errors. Fair Paper deviates from topic; contains less than stellar quotes, paraphrasing and summarizing; Some grammatical errors.

Good Paper covers topic; Only slight deviations from topic; Very few grammatical errors; Contains quotes, paraphrasing and summarizing. Excellent Paper covers topic; No or minor grammatical errors; contains quotes, paraphrasing and summarizing. Preview Preview this rubric. Edit Modify this rubric.

Copy Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy. Print Show a printable version of this rubric. Categorize Add this rubric to multiple categories. Bookmark Bookmark this rubric for future reference. Test run Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment. Grade Build a gradebook to assess students. Collaborate Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess. Publish Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email Email this rubric to a friend. Discuss Discuss this rubric with other members. Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible. Sometimes ties together information from all sources. Paper does not flow - disjointedness is apparent. Author's writing does not demonstrate an understanding of the relationship among material obtained from all sources. Does not tie together information. Paper does not flow and appears to be created from disparate issues.

Headings are necessary to link concepts. Writing does not demonstrate understanding any relationships. More than 5 current sources, of which at least 3 are peer-review journal articles or scholarly books.

Sources include both general background sources and specialized sources. Special-interest sources and popular literature are acknowledged as such if they are cited. All web sites utilized are authoritative. All web sites utilized are credible. Fewer than 5 current sources, or fewer than 2 of 5 are peer-reviewed journal articles or scholarly books. Cites all data obtained from other sources. APA citation style is used in both text and bibliography.

Research Paper Rubric Word doc. Rubric for Scoring Effective Writing Word doc. Persuasive Essay Rubric Word doc Mr. History and Government class rubric: Rubrics for Middle School Includes invention report, book talk, persuasive essay and autobiographical event essay.

Math Rubrics 4 levels of math understanding with performance criteria. Science Rubric pdf Performance criteria for use of scientific tools, science reasoning and strategies, science concepts and use of data and communication. Physics Project Rubric A good example of a performance rubric tuned a specific project. Easy to adapt to other subjects. Kindergarten Rubrics Assess literacy development. Kindergarten Rubrics Evaluates communication, fine muscle development, emergent reading and writing, large muscle development, math development, creative arts, personal development and work habits, play and social skills.

Third Grade Venn Diagram Rubric. Rubistar Choose a topic and create a new rubric based on a template. Save and edit your rubric online. Rubric Template Insert the task and criteria into this template. Rubric Template Word doc Word document template to download and modify to meet authentic assessment needs University of West Florida.

Annenberg Learner Build a Rubric. Single-Point Rubric Word doc.

Main Topics

Privacy Policy

Research Paper Rubric Name: _____ Date: _____ Score: _____ Category Exceeds Standard Meets Standard Nearly Meets Standard Does Not Meet Standard No Evidence Score Title Page Title Your Name, Teacher’ s Name, Course Period, Date, Neatly finished -no errors.

Privacy FAQs

Characteristics to note in the rubric: Language is descriptive, not evaluative. Labels for degrees of success are descriptive (“Expert” “Proficient”, etc.); by avoiding the use of letters representing grades or numbers representing points, there is no implied contract that qualities of the paper will “add up” to a specified score or grade or that all dimensions are of equal grading.

About Our Ads

Research Paper Rubric Name: _____ Date: _____ Score: _____ Category Exceeds Standard Meets Standard Nearly Meets Standard Does Not Meet Standard No Evidence Score Title Page Title Your Name, Teacher’s Name, Course Period, Date, Neatly finished-no errors Evidence of four Evidence of 3 Evidence of 2 or less Absent. Research Paper Rubric (A) (B) (C) (D) (F) Thesis clearly stated and appropriately focused clearly stated but focus could have been sharper thesis phrasing too simple.

Cookie Info

Research Paper Grading Rubric Name: Course: Date: (The Psychology Department at San José State University is acknowledged for the basic structure of this form.) CATEGORY Unacceptable (Below Standards) Acceptable (Meets Standards) Good (Occasionally . Rubrics are a useful tool for setting expectations and grading student work. This lesson will provide you with examples for a rubric you can use when teaching and assessing research papers written.